
50 free spins
- Payout
- Within minutes
- Min. deposit*
- £10
- Licence
- UKGC
- Wagering
- 0x spins

Company profile
Dazzletag Entertainment Limited formerly operated British casinos including Casushi, Peachy Games and Fruit Kings. These brands now appear under Solaya Group Limited, while Dazzletag's British licences were surrendered in August 2026. Understanding that change helps identify the company responsible for current accounts and separate today's conditions from older reviews.
Selected offers across different operators. This company's connected brands are listed below.
UKGC-licensed casinos · 18+ · New customers · T&Cs apply.

50 free spins
50 + 200 free spins

100% up to £100

50 + 50 free spins

50% up to £100
100 spins + 300 LadBucks
200 free spins
100 free spins

£30 bonuses + 50 spins
100 free spins
Dazzletag Entertainment Ltd was a casino operator, rather than simply a label connecting similar websites. Its Gambling Commission record lists casino, bingo and gambling-software permissions as surrendered on 6 August 2026. This is its British licensing position, not a statement about every possible overseas activity.
| Detail | Verified information |
|---|---|
| Former operating company | Dazzletag Entertainment Limited, also abbreviated Ltd |
| Former British account | 39358; permissions surrendered 6 August 2026 |
| Current operator of featured brands | Solaya Group Limited; account 100050 |
| Transfer recorded in brand terms | 1 April 2026 |
| Detailed comparisons | Casushi, Peachy Games and Fruit Kings |
| Information checked | 13 October 2026 |
As with the account relationships examined in our White Hat Gaming guide, the company named in the current agreement identifies responsibility. A familiar casino brand can continue while the legal business operating it changes.
Dazzletag’s former portfolio includes Casushi, Peachy Games, Fruit Kings, PlaySunny, Bingo Stars and Zebra Bingo. The last three also appear in Dazzletag's inactive domain history; that historical connection does not establish their current operator or operating status. This article concentrates on three brands whose current account policies could be compared directly.
The current Solaya domain register lists the three featured websites. The comparison below concerns their published conditions under Solaya, not terms offered under Dazzletag's surrendered licence. Slots, live casino and table games appear across all three; Peachy additionally lists bingo.
| Comparison field | Casushi — casushi.com | Peachy Games — peachygames.com | Fruit Kings — fruitkings.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current operator | Solaya Group Limited | Solaya Group Limited | Solaya Group Limited |
| Game types listed | Slots, live casino, table games, Slingo, instant games | Slots, live casino, table games, Slingo, instant games and bingo | Slots, live casino, table games, Slingo, instant games |
| Withdrawal minimum / timeframe | £10 online; smaller sums via support; expected receipt within five working days | £10 online; smaller sums via support; expected receipt within five working days | £10 online; smaller sums via support; expected receipt within five working days |
| Checked welcome conditions | £10 first deposit plus £10 eligible slot stakes; 40 Big Bass Splash spins; 48-hour expiry; cash winnings, no further wagering | £10 first deposit plus £10 eligible slot stakes; 40 Big Bass Splash spins; 48-hour expiry; cash winnings, no further wagering | Same deposit, slot-stake, expiry and cash-winnings conditions; 40/100 spin quantities in different page versions |
| Main limitation | Published account conditions do not establish a payout or support advantage | Bingo does not qualify for the checked slot welcome offer | Applicable spin quantity unresolved; separate campaigns not confirmed |
The shared policies below are not brand-specific advantages. Complete game inventories and actual service performance were not tested.



Former Dazzletag brands transferred to Solaya. The article explains the operator change and current account policies.
The featured brands' terms record a move to Solaya on 1 April 2026. Casushi describes an internal group restructuring with no change to ownership, management or services. This establishes a change of contracting company, not simply a new name for Dazzletag. The later August licence surrender is a separate event.
Historical transactions may name Dazzletag, while current withdrawals follow the current agreement. The transfer does not establish fresh welcome-offer eligibility, a combined wallet or removal of account restrictions.
The checked welcome conditions require a £10 first deposit and £10 of eligible slot stakes before spins are awarded. Spins expire after 48 hours; their winnings become cash without further wagering. Qualifying stakes can still lose money, so the absence of wagering on spin winnings does not make qualification cost-free.
Peachy Games' bingo category is a verified product difference within this comparison. Its welcome terms exclude bingo, Slingo, live casino and table games from qualifying play. Spending £10 in bingo therefore would not satisfy the slot offer, despite bingo being available on the same site.
Fruit Kings' homepage welcome banner and accompanying Welcome Offer Terms describe 40 Big Bass Splash spins. The Welcome Offer Terms embedded in its Information → Bonus Terms page, at /information/bonusterms/, describe 100 Big Bass Splash spins. Both specify a £10 first deposit, £10 in eligible slot stakes, £0.10 spins and a 48-hour expiry.
The Fruit Kings Bonus Terms page was available in an older indexed version than the homepage. No campaign identifier or eligibility difference established that the two quantities belong to separate promotions. An outdated page or campaign variation remains possible; the evidence does not prove a simultaneous contradiction. The applicable quantity needs confirmation against the offer actually presented at registration.
Fruit Kings also publishes Daily Catch, a separate promotion using credits called Bait. Those credits have no cash value and expire after 24 hours; awarded spins also have a 24-hour expiry and pay winnings as cash without wagering. This demonstrates differing deadlines within one brand, not an exclusive advantage over Casushi or Peachy Games.
The three checked rulebooks give the matching minimum and five-working-day receipt estimate shown in the table. The estimate concerns money reaching the customer; a separate guaranteed review period was not established. A sufficiently clear matching fee schedule was also unavailable, so there is no basis for a blanket claim of fee-free withdrawals.
Their support information says payments normally return to the funding source, with a verified bank account used where that is impossible. Electronic identity checks may be supplemented by documents. These shared requirements can affect an individual withdrawal even when the advertised timetable is the same.
Claims of near-instant processing do not independently establish how long a particular bank payment will take. Operator review, release and bank receipt are different stages. For a delayed payment, the useful enquiry is which stage remains unfinished and whether further verification is required.
Customer-funds protection is a material limitation. Casushi's published terms say customer money is held separately from company funds but is not protected if the operator becomes insolvent. Section 2.3 of the independently checked Peachy Games and Fruit Kings terms gives the same disclosure. Segregation therefore should not be described as insolvency protection at these three brands.
All three advertise live chat from 9am to 6:30pm daily and a 24-hour email-response target. Their complaint routes start with support, escalate to senior management and identify IBAS for eligible unresolved disputes after a final response or eight weeks. These are published commitments, not measured response times.
For escalation, retain the complaint reference and final response identifying the disputed transaction or offer. Acknowledgment is separate from resolution.
The Casushi account policy says customer-set financial limits apply to that website's account and do not automatically extend to other Solaya sites. Self-exclusion has a wider scope: it describes restricting other accounts across the operator's brands within 24 hours. These controls should not be treated as interchangeable.
Casushi's financial-limit guidance distinguishes a Deposit Limit, which counts all deposits, from a Net Limit, which subtracts completed withdrawals. With a £50 limit and £50 deposited, a £20 withdrawal restores no capacity under the Deposit Limit but could restore £20 under the Net Limit. Any other applicable restriction still applies; this example explains the calculation, not a reason to redeposit.
Separate account limits do not create one operator-wide spending cap. Unsubscribing from marketing also does not close an account or apply a gambling restriction.
The comparison establishes a shared current operator, matching published withdrawal minimums and receipt estimates, comparable complaint routes and the same stated lack of insolvency protection. These findings give readers a useful account-policy baseline; they do not show that one brand pays faster or resolves complaints better.
Peachy's bingo offering and its exclusion from slot-offer qualification are meaningful product conditions. Fruit Kings' unresolved welcome quantity limits any firm comparison of promotional value. Consistent current offer pages, clearer fee disclosures and evidence of actual payment and support performance would be needed for a stronger judgement.
When comparing this portfolio with ProgressPlay casinos, use those same fields: operator identity, withdrawal minimum, processing versus receipt, bonus eligibility and fund protection. The operator connection explains responsibility, while the verified account conditions determine what the comparison can support.
No verified related brands are available in this profile yet.
Its British permissions are recorded as surrendered. The featured domains are now registered under Solaya, whose casino and bingo permissions are active.
No. The brand terms describe a transfer between operating companies within a group, changing the company responsible for the current agreement.
No such conclusion follows from the register. The featured brands' current listings and transfer statements show continued operation under another company.
No. The main portfolio section distinguishes the wider historical connections from the three sites examined in detail. Historical inclusion alone does not confirm current operation.
The reviewed material does not establish a shared cash wallet or transfers between brands. Each balance remains an account-specific matter unless the operator expressly confirms otherwise.